Low concentration atropine and myopia: a narrative review of the evidence for United Kingdom based practitioners.

The prevalence of myopia is increasing across the world. Controlling myopia progression would be beneficial to reduce adverse outcomes such as retinal detachment and myopic maculopathy which are associated with increased axial length. Pharmacological control of myopia progression with atropine has been investigated since the 19th century and the benefits of slowing myopia progression are considered against the side-effects of near blur and photophobia. More recently, randomised trials have focused on determining the optimum concentration of atropine leading to low-concentration atropine being used to manage myopia progression by practitioners across the world. Currently, in the United Kingdom, there is no licensed pharmacological intervention for myopia management. The aim of this review is to interpret the available data to inform clinical practice. We conducted a narrative review of the literature and identified peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials using the search terms 'myopia' and 'atropine', limited to the English language. We identified two key studies, which were the Atropine in the Treatment Of Myopia (ATOM) and Low-concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP). Further studies were identified using the above search terms and the references from the identified literature. Atropine 0.01% has a modest effect on controlling axial length progression. Atropine 0.05% appears to be superior to atropine 0.01% in managing myopia progression. There is a dose-dependent rebound effect when treatment is stopped. Atropine is a well-tolerated, safe, and effective intervention. Treatment would be needed for several years and into adolescence, until axial length progression is stable.

Post-operative Horner's Syndrome Following Total Thyroidectomy: A Case Report.

The oculosympathetic chain is a three-neuron pathway responsible for sympathetic innervation to the eye, which follows a complex anatomical course through the head and neck. Neck surgery may cause injury to this pathway, causing loss of sympathetic innervation producing the eponymous Horner's syndrome (ipsilateral ptosis, miosis and anhidrosis), but this is rare in the reported literature. We present the case of a 23-year-old female who underwent total thyroidectomy for a right-sided, metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma. Following surgery, in the immediate postoperative period, she was noted to have unilateral ptosis and miosis. This patient was assessed by an ophthalmologist due to persistent unilateral ocular symptoms following thyroidectomy. She was subsequently diagnosed with right-sided Horner's syndrome. The diagnosis was confirmed following the observed reversal of her ocular symptoms using apraclonidine 1% minims. The management of Horner's syndrome following thyroidectomy is conservative if no evidence of compressive hematoma or seroma is identified as in this case. The patient was followed up at six weeks following thyroidectomy and a partial improvement in ptosis was noted. The patient also reported blurred vision secondary to increased refractive error due to reduced pupillary function in her right eye. Prognosticating recovery from Horner's syndrome following thyroidectomy is challenging due to limited evidence. Horner's syndrome as a possible complication of thyroidectomy should be counselled to patients pre-operatively. A residual deficit from Horner's syndrome may cause functional impairment in addition to the poor cosmetic outcome.

Retrospective Analysis of Treatment Patterns in Pseudophakic Diabetic Macular Oedema Eyes Treated with Anti-VEGF.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of outcomes in 81 pseudophakic eyes with DMO that received at least 6 anti-VEGF injections. We reviewed baseline and posttreatment optical coherence tomography images, visual acuity, prescribing patterns, time taken to deliver anti-VEGF injections, and structural and functional outcomes. RESULTS: It took an average of 913 ± 454.1 days to deliver a mean of 11.1 ± 4.7 anti-VEGF injections. Time from baseline to receiving the first 6 anti-VEGF injections was longer than 9 months in 74.7% (n = 59/79) of eyes. There was a mean gain of 1.6 letters (-0.03 logMAR) from baseline to the end point. After 5 anti-VEGF intravitreal injections, the mean CMT was 391.9 µm from 474.4 µm at baseline (p < 0.0001). In 52 of 79 eyes (65.8%), more than one type of anti-VEGF agent was used. CONCLUSIONS: The anti-VEGF treatment used to treat these eyes with DMO was suboptimal, a finding consistent with recently published "real-world" data. There was a strong tendency for patients to be switched within the class to a second anti-VEGF agent.

COVID-19 Antibodies and Outcomes among Outpatient Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.

Background: Patients on maintenance hemodialysis are particularly vulnerable to infection and hospitalization from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Due to immunocompromised patients and the clustering that occurs in outpatient dialysis units, the seroprevalence of COVID-19 antibodies in this population is unknown and has significant implications for public health. Also, little is known about their risk factors for hospitalization. Methods: Three outpatient maintenance hemodialysis units affiliated with a major teaching hospital in the New York area were studied. We determined rates of SARS-CoV-2 positivity via nasopharyngeal, real-time, reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR); SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity; hospitalization; and mortality. Results: Of 367 patients, 28% had either SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity or PCR positivity. Prevalence across the three respective units was 7%, 32%, and 70%. Those who were either antibody or PCR positive were significantly younger (65 versus 69 years, P=0.05), and had a higher prevalence of Black race (43% versus 30%, P=0.001) and Hispanic ethnicity (32% versus 12%, P<0.001) compared with those who tested negative. Higher positivity rates were also observed among those who took taxis and ambulettes to and from dialysis, compared with those who used personal transportation. Antibodies were detected in all of the patients with a positive PCR result who underwent serologic testing. Of those that were seropositive, 32% were asymptomatic. The hospitalization rate on the basis of either antibody or PCR positivity was 35%, with a hospital mortality rate of 33%. Aside from COPD, no other variables were more prevalent in patients who were hospitalized. Conclusions: We observed significant differences in rates of COVID-19 infection within three outpatient dialysis units, with universal seroconversion. Among patients with ESKD, rates of asymptomatic infection appear to be high, as do hospitalization and mortality rates.

Endotheliitis-A Presentation of Acanthamoeba Keratitis.

PURPOSE: To report endotheliitis as an early, key presenting sign of Acanthamoeba keratitis in patients who are soft contact lens wearers. METHODS: We report 4 cases of patients presenting with pain, red eye, and reduction in vision in the context of soft contact lens wear. On examination, the predominant clinical finding was that of endotheliitis, localized fusiform stromal edema with corresponding keratic precipitates, anterior chamber inflammation, and minimal epithelial and anterior stromal signs. The classical signs of Acanthamoeba keratitis were not present. RESULTS: All 4 cases were clinically diagnosed as Acanthamoeba endotheliitis; corneal scrapes were negative; case 1 was polymerase chain reaction positive, and case 3 underwent confocal microscopy that showed double-walled cysts, suggesting Acanthamoeba. All responded well to anti-Acanthamoeba medication alone with 3 cases achieving complete resolution with minimal anterior stromal scarring by 7 weeks. Case 1 had steroid treatment before being seen at our unit and had a prolonged course of treatment with complete resolution by 4 months. CONCLUSIONS: It is imperative to have a high index of suspicion for Acanthamoeba in patients presenting with pain and endotheliitis in the context of contact lens wear, even in the absence of classical signs.

Agreement amongst consultant ophthalmologists on levels of visual disability required for eligibility for certificate of sight impairment : Sight impairment registration using binocular composite visual fields.

BACKGROUND: Registration as sight impaired allows access to services important for patients. The rates of sight impairment due to visual field loss are underestimated. Previous work has shown that evaluation of visual field defects in both eyes produces poor agreement among ophthalmologists for categorisation of patients as eligible for sight impairment registration. AIM: To evaluate the impact of binocular summation of both eye glaucomatous visual field defects on agreement for sight impairment registration. METHODS: Thirty consultant ophthalmologists (Graders), graded 50 glaucomatous visual field sets. Each consisted of both monocular fields and summated binocular plots. Graders classified the visual field sets as sight impaired (SI), severely sight impaired (SSI) or neither. Trichotomous, (SI, SSI or no sight impairment) and dichotomous (any sight impairment versus no sight impairment) concordance values were estimated for the group of graders as a whole and for glaucoma and non-glaucoma experts. RESULTS: For trichotomous analysis the overall kappa agreement rate was 0.29; for dichotomous analysis it was 0.40. There was no material difference between glaucoma experts and non-experts. CONCLUSION: Overall agreement was modest. Grading for SI showed the poorest levels of agreement. Using binocular fields does not appear to improve concordance for sight impairment registration. Moreover, there is no difference in agreement between glaucoma and non-glaucoma experts. An overall score for visual disability using mean deviation may be a more pragmatic approach.

Optometrist referrals to an emergency ophthalmology department: a retrospective review to identify current practise and development of shared care working strategies, in England.

BACKGROUND: Direct referrals from optometrists account for up to 10% eye casualty attendances. Despite this, there remains a paucity of literature on optometrist referrals to eye casualty. A better understanding of these referrals could be helpful in the development of shared care emergency pathways. Diagnostic agreement between optometrists and ophthalmologists for emergency referrals can be used to identify areas for development of shared care working strategies in emergency ophthalmology. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 1059 consecutive optometric emergency referrals to Moorfields Eye Hospital was conducted. Referrals were only included when a letter or documentation for the reason for referral was provided. Diagnostic information from the referring optometrist and casualty doctor was summarised for each patient by an investigator (VMT) and recorded on a single spreadsheet. These clinical summaries were compared by a second independent investigator (IJ) and marked as agreeing, disagreeing or uncertain. Each clinical summary was then mapped to a diagnostic category using key word searches which were manually re-checked against the original summaries. Information on the timing of the referral and the outcome at the emergency department visit was also collated. Inter-observer agreement for diagnostic categories was measured using kappa coefficients. RESULTS: Diagnostic agreement ranged between kappa 0.59 and 0.87. It was best for diagnoses within the red eye category (kappa 0.87). Compliance with College of Optometrists referral guidance ranged between 11 and 100%. More than half of referrals for elevated intra-ocular pressure were discharged at the eye casualty visit. Overall, 54% of patients were managed with advice alone, 39% required treatment following referral and 7% required onward referral from eye casualty. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients referred by optometrists were managed with advice alone. A collaborative approach at the point referral could be helpful to improve referral efficiency.

Malpractice awareness among surgeons at a teaching hospital in Pakistan.

BACKGROUND: The duty of a doctor to take care presumes the person who offers medical advice and treatment to unequivocally possess the skills and knowledge to do so. However, a sense of responsibility cannot be guaranteed in the absence of accountability, which in turn requires a comprehensive medical law system to be in place. Such a system is almost non-existent in Pakistan. Keeping the above in mind, we designed this study to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices of surgeons regarding malpractice at a tertiary care center in Pakistan. METHODS: This was an observational, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study conducted during a three month period from 31st March, 2012 to 30th June, 2012 at Civil Hospital, Karachi. Surgeons who were available during the period of our study and had been working in the hospital for at least 6 months were included. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed after seeking informed, written consent. The specialties included were general surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, neurosurgery, ophthalmology, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, pediatric surgery, orthopedic surgery, oral and maxillofacial surgery and gynecology and obstetrics. The study questionnaire comprised of four sections. The first section was concerned with the demographics of the surgeons. The second section analyzed the knowledge of the respondents regarding professional negligence and malpractice. The third section assessed the attitudes surgeons with regard to malpractice. The last section dealt with the general and specific practices and experiences of surgeons regarding malpractice. RESULTS: Of the 319 surgeons interviewed, 68.7% were oblivious of the complete definition of malpractice. Leaving foreign objects inside the patient (79.6%) was the most commonly agreed upon form of malpractice, whereas failure to break news in entirety (43.9%) was most frequently disagreed. In the event of a medical error, majority (67.7%) were ready to disclose their error to the patient. The most common perceived reason for not disclosing the error was threat of a claim or assault (90.9%). Majority (68.3%) believed that malpractice had a negative effect on reputation. Only 13(4.1%) had received at least one legal claim for damages. Only about three-fourths (75.5%) had the habit of frequently obtaining informed consent from the patients. 83(26.0%) expressed reluctance in accepting a case that was deemed to be difficult. Financial gains and liabilities were responsible for biased approach in 8.5% and 12.2% of the respondents respectively. CONCLUSION: There is a dire need of programs aimed at increasing awareness among practicing surgeons in our setup. Proactive measures are required for the formulation of an efficient system of litigation. Physician accountability will not only arouse a greater sense of responsibility in them, but will also augment the confidence placed by patients on the healthcare system.

Protein accumulation underlying lifespan extension via ovariectomy in grasshoppers is consistent with the disposable soma hypothesis but is not due to dietary restriction.

Reduced reproduction extends lifespan in many experimental animals, but the mechanism by which this occurs is unclear. The disposable soma hypothesis suggests that when reproduction is reduced, more nutrients are allocated to the soma and lifespan is extended. Alternatively, the reproductive tissues or the process of reproduction may have a direct (i.e., non-nutritional) negative effect on lifespan. We used ovariectomized grasshoppers to examine the effects of reduced reproduction throughout the lifespan at the physiological level. We focused on protein, the limiting nutrient for egg production. Ovariectomized females lived significantly longer than sham females. Because both groups ingested similar amounts, the effect was independent of dietary restriction. Despite this, ovariectomized females gained less body mass than sham females. Ovariectomized grasshoppers produced the egg yolk-precursor protein vitellogenin. At the time sham females laid their first clutch, cumulative reproductive protein was similar in ovariectomized and sham females. By advanced ages, however, ovariectomized females had produced about five-fold less cumulative reproductive protein than sham females. In contrast, old ovariectomized females had at least two-fold more hemolymph storage protein. These results are consistent with ovariectomy extending lifespan in part via enhanced protein allocation to storage at the expense of reproduction.